Saturday, June 28, 2014

Procedural Safeguards -The Series Part XIII

Drive Thru LAWYER !
Drive Thru LAWYER ! (Photo credit: brookenovak)

This is the final installment in a multi-part series on procedural safeguards under the federal special education law, the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act. I work a lot in this area, so it is near and dear to my heart. Despite the importance of procedural safeguards. however, many issues in this area are misunderstood. I hope that all of the different types of special education stakeholders who read this blog find the information in this series helpful. Be sure to tell me what you thought about the series.

Attorneys’ Fees

IDEA’04 changed the section on attorneys’ fees to provide that a school district or SEA may now recover their attorneys’ fees from the parent’s attorney who files a complaint that is frivolous, unreasonable, or without foundation or who continues to litigate after the litigation clearly becomes frivolous, unreasonable, or without foundation. Section 615 (i)(3)(B)(i)(II). Also, the statute now provides that a school district or SEA may now recover their attorneys’ fees from the parent or the parent’s attorney where the claim was presented for an improper purpose, such as to harass, to cause unnecessary delay or to needlessly increase the cost of litigation. Section 615 (i)(3)(B)(i)(III). The standard for an award against a parent’s attorney or a parent is very high, and it is unlikely that many awards of attorneys’ fees will be made against parent’s attorneys, and especially against parents without attorneys. These new provisions, however, may cause counsel who represent parents to decline borderline cases. There could also be awards in those rare cases in which parents clearly abuse the system. OSEP declined to clarify the standard for an award of attorney’s fees against a parent stating that judicial interpretations would likely vary on a case-by-case basis and should be left to the discretion of the court. 34 CFR Section 300.517(c)(2)(ii); 71 Fed. Register No. 156 at page 46708 (August 14, 2006).

The provision permitting an award of attorneys’ fees to parents who prevail in a due process or court proceeding remains unchanged in IDEA’04. The regulations provide that attorney’s fees may not be awarded for attending IEP team meetings, except where they are convened as a result of judicial action, an administrative proceeding, or in the discretion of the state, for a mediation. 71 Fed. Register No. 156 at pages 46708-09 (August 14, 2006).

ADDITIONAL RESOURCES: OSEP has also published a Question and Answer document, Questions and Answers On Procedural Safeguards and Due Process Procedures For Parents and Children With Disabilities (OSEP Revised June 2009). The Q & A document is available at the OSEP IDEA website

In addition, NICHCY, also known as the National Dissemination Center for Children with Disabilities, has issued a series of training module on procedural safeguards. The training modules are available online here. and as to all matters involving dispute resolution, take a quick look at the CADRE website. (Note: the NICHCY resources are being migrated to the Center for Parent Information and Resources.)


  1. this info is great. I always had the attitude that parents have all the rights, and to a certain point this is true. I also think that some teachers really do look out for the best for their students. I have seen some parents take advantage of the system. I almost want to say thank goodness there is some protection for the school and its district from families that do take advantage, and get in the way of their child's education.

  2. Thanks for the updates on special education laws; this series is very informative! That's interesting that the school district can recover their attorney's fees if the parent files a frivolous complaint. I'm also glad that an award of attorney's fees is given to the parents if they win the case. A lot of parents of special needs children don't have a lot of money for lawyer's fees. This seems like a very fair safeguard!

  3. Anon & Eliza,

    Thanks for your comments.