Thursday, March 6, 2008

Procedural Safeguards - Part II

We continue the series on the IDEA procedural safeguards, other than the four methods of dispute resolution which have been discussed in a previous series. Today we begin to examine how the IDEA'04 changes and the latest federal regulations impact the notice of procedural safeguards required by the IDEA.

IDEA’04 makes some changes concerning when a copy of the procedural safeguards notice must be given to parents. A copy of the notice must now be provided to the parents only one time per year, except that it must also be given upon initial referral or parental request for evaluation, upon the first occurrence of filing of a due process complaint, and upon request by a parent. Section 615(d)(1)(A). The regulations clarify that the notice must also be provided upon the parents’ filing of the first state complaint and on the date on which the decision to take disciplinary action is made. 34 CFR Section 300.504(a); 71 Fed. Register No. 156 at page 46692 (August 14, 2006). The regulations also make it clear that a parent will receive more than one copy of the notice of procedural safeguards if they also request an evaluation or file a state complaint or due process hearing or they request a copy. 34 CFR Section 300.504(a); 71 Fed. Register No. 156 at page 46692 (August 14, 2006). The local educational agency may also place a copy of the procedural safeguards notice on their website if they have one. Section 615(d)(1)(B). OSEP has noted that publishing the notice on its website does not relieve the LEA of the responsibility of offering the parent a printed copy of the notice unless the parent evidences a clear preference to obtain the information electronically 71 Fed. Register No. 156 at page 46693 (August 14, 2006).

The procedural safeguards notice must include a full explanation of procedural safeguards, written in the native language of the parents (unless clearly not feasible) and written in an easily understandable manner, relating to the following:

`(A) independent educational evaluation;
`(B) prior written notice;
`(C) parental consent;
`(D) access to educational records;
`(E) the opportunity to present and resolve complaints, including--
`(i) the time period in which to make a complaint;
`(ii) the opportunity for the agency to resolve the complaint; and
`(iii) the availability of mediation;
`(F) the child's placement during pendency of due process proceedings;
`(G) procedures for students who are subject to placement in an interim alternative educational setting;
`(H) requirements for unilateral placement by parents of children in private schools at public expense;
`(I) due process hearings, including requirements for disclosure of evaluation results and recommendations;
`(J) State-level appeals (if applicable in that State);
`(K) civil actions, including the time period in which to file such actions; and
`(L) attorneys' fees.
Section 615 (d)(2).

OSEP has published a model Notice of Procedural Safeguards in order to reduce confusion about what must be included in the notice. 71 Fed. Register No. 156 at page 46693 (August 14, 2006). The model notice is 44 pages long. (So much for easily understandable language, etc.) The model notice form is available on the OSEP IDEA website: http://idea.ed.gov/.
Although OSEP frowns upon dual filings of state complaints and due process hearings for the same incident, the regulations clarify that the notice of procedural safeguards must explain both procedures and the differences between the two. 34 CFR Section 300.504(c); 71 Fed. Register No. 156 at page 46693 (August 14, 2006).

3 comments:

  1. Too bad the notice of procedural safeguards requirement doesn't include a provision where the school district has to be able to explain to the parent what the procedural safeguards are and what they mean -- on video.

    Now that would be a procedural safeguard!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Video is underused. Webinars would be a related method for states to use.

    JG

    ReplyDelete
  3. newbie here but old time advocate,

    i have a question about written complaints. if the state agency failed to conduct an investigation despite the fact that the DOE's complaint management office stated in their report to parents that they did conduct an investigation, what are the remedies if the written complaint was never investigated in the first place? can the complaint be refiled or appealed? what is the timeline for appeal and to whom?

    thanks
    teresa

    ReplyDelete